At first glance, the Olympics look like so-called fair Games: the best athletes compete, and the best win. But is it really that simple? The truth is much more brutal. Medals are influenced by much more than talent. An athlete represents their country. Nowadays, the Games increasingly feel like a competition between nations, where the medal count is a source of national pride and international recognition.
Wealth, population, politics, and opportunities all play a part in determining who gets to stand on the podium. We're going to see five axes behind medals in Olympics: gender representation, geography of medal winners, athlete body types, geopolitical disruptions, and economic fairness. Scroll through the story to see how social, political, and economic contexts have shaped the Games over time.
The data shows that Olympic success is not only a question of individual excellence. It is also shaped by access, institutions, national wealth, political stability, and the historical inclusion or exclusion of different groups.
Over time, the Games have become more inclusive, especially in terms of gender representation. Yet large inequalities remain in which countries win medals, which sports receive attention, and which bodies are considered optimal for success. The Olympics are therefore both a sporting event and a mirror of global inequalities.